|

Are ‘Dollars’ The New Four Letter Word?
By The Exchange Rate Vigilante
Since the end of November, the main topic of conversation is,
without a doubt, the very sudden appreciation of the Kwacha. And
rightly so.
One hears many reasons for the increased number of Dollars on the
market. The good ones : copper prices and copper production is up;
non-traditional exports are up; income from tourism is up; less
foreign debt payments. And the bad ones: speculation by one of the
banks who brought in an enormous amount of Dollars; flooding of the
market with Dollars as we have a large payment to make for some
commodity such as maize. And of course, the forthcoming elections
cannot be ruled out.
I
am no economist. Neither have I studied business or economics or any
of those disciplines at one of the many universities around the
world. But what I do have is a smattering of common sense. And my
common sense tells me that, in what is a Dollar based economy (even
though our legal tender is Kwacha),if people are getting less
Kwachas for their Dollars and the Kwacha prices are not coming down
accordingly, something has got to give.
First, let’s take into account the background realities of doing
business in Zambia. It is the most expensive country in the region
in which to do business. We have the regions most expensive fuel.
Being landlocked, our transport costs to get our inputs in and our
exports out of the country are astronomically high. Despite the
improvements over the last ten years, we still have poor road
infrastructure off the main trunk roads. The inefficiencies of
Government takes its toll on operating costs (how many times must we
run in and out of Lusaka chasing licences and permits, only to be
told ‘he’s not around, come back next week’ or ‘he’s at a workshop,
come back next week). We have one of the most expensive Public
Switched Telephone Networks in the world; and in the rural areas,
one of the most unreliable, where it exists at all. The same can be
said of our electricity supply. Have you ever tried to run
production machinery with constant electrical brownouts and
blackouts? This causes havoc to ones expensive production machines.
More cost for spare parts and repairs due to a ‘dirty’ power supply
equals high operating costs. The bottom line : a lot of businesses
in this country were already marginal, but were committed to making
a success out of their small ventures, to the ultimate benefit of
Zambia. These very same businesses now find themselves being
hammered by exchange rates.
The first to give are going to be our exporters; first the small
ones who employ only tens of people. They will be closely followed
by those who employ hundreds of people. By the first week of
December, I knew of at least one small exporter (in a remote area)
who had closed down and laid off all but two of his staff. By the
end of December, I knew of two exporters who had each laid off 400
workers. Total 810 workers, and take a very generous rule of thumb
that each person employed supports eight people (I usually work on a
1:10 ratio), and you now have 6480 people without any means of
feeding, housing and clothing themselves.
Next to give is the tourism industry. Already, this industry have
published their international rates for 2006 and 2007, and in some
cases, 2008. But most of their costs (salaries, fuel, food) are
Kwacha based. Although I have not spoken to any operators who have
laid off staff, all of those who I have spoken with are planning to
do so. And the casualties will be the unskilled workers who are the
easiest to replace if (note I say ‘if’ not ‘when’) things improve.
I
do not even want to start counting the casualties in the mining and
agricultural industry, but latest figures given to me by those in
the know are beekeepers 200,000; cotton 300,000; tobacco 200,000,
horticulture 16,000, coffee 10,000 plus. Total 726,000. And the 1:8
ratio 5,808,000. Approximately half of our population walking the
streets.
So, in terms of businesses, the first casualties are going to be our
exporters. And our exporters are generally those who employ large
numbers of people. Large numbers of people out on the streets equals
an increase in crime, which equals a breakdown in law and order
which equals anarchy. Gone is the peace and stability we are so
quick to shout about. And with this comes a reduction (or complete
stop) on new investment into the country. After people out on the
streets, comes a shortage of foreign exchange. Remember the 70’s and
80’s; the days of the pipeline; the days of FEMAC. How short our
memories are!
And very soon, those that are coining it now, the traders and
importers, will be affected. There will be no money for the
population to buy the goods which they are importing. Which also
brings to mind that because excise and duties are reduced, and
thereby VAT, the overall income to the central treasury will be
reduced. As people lose jobs, other taxes will also reduce. How is
the Government going to meet its salary bill each month?
Unfortunately, I cannot delay getting this edition to the printers,
so cannot wait until the budget is presented to Parliament this
Friday. It will be an interesting balancing act which our Minister
of Finance is to perform.
The worst part of this entire debacle must be the reaction of some
of our leaders and officials. “But the exchange rate is down”. This
must brighten the hearts of the majority of the population; until
they lose their jobs and have no nshima to eat that evening. That is
when they will fully understand the implications. “Cars are now
affordable” Again, something to brighten the heart of someone who
can’t put food on the table. That is assuming they even have a
table. How short sighted!
And where does the Bank of Zambia fit into all of this? Is it not
the responsibility of the Bank to monitor the currency on the
market? And, when deemed necessary, to buy up the excess Dollars to
keep our exchange rate stable. An unstable exchange rate is the sign
of a weak economy. And this was a perfect opportunity to build up
our foreign reserves for the time when the copper price gets sent
back down the shaft, as it did in the 70’s.
George Bernard Shaw once said “if all economists were laid end to
end, they would not reach a conclusion”. Not being an economist
myself, I am therefore able to reach a conclusion or more than one
conclusion. And the conclusions are very, very simple. Firstly, we
have not even started to feel the effects of this. The effect will
more than likely only begin to show towards the end of 2006. Just in
time for the elections. And hungry voters are not good voters. The
second is that 2006 is going to be a very difficult year for our
country.
Now is the time for some progressive and forward thinking, followed
by action, for the benefit of this country rather than for the
benefit of a select few individuals. |